Antivirus software shields computer systems against malware which could steal personal data, take control pcs and tainted files. Selecting the most appropriate tool for your requirements is a trial, and you may be overwhelmed by all of the options out there. One way to narrow down your options is by taking a look at how the anti virus tools operate in medical tests designed to assess performance and protection.

A few important factors to consider include false advantages (when the tool misidentifies and blocks secure programs), system impact (the amount of resources that are dragged straight down during runs or various other tasks), and speed of detection. This post will examine a number of well-known, independent studies performed by simply leading UTAV tools.


The AV-Comparatives test lab is usually widely regarded as being the most trustworthy and thorough testing clinical in the industry. That they run a a few different tests, including real world safeguard tests, diagnosis of contaminated files and gratification evaluations. AV-Comparatives also posts quarterly accounts for a number of goods, which makes it practical to quickly assess the quality of varied solutions in the marketplace.

Bitdefender Total Security

In AV-Comparatives assessments, the latest type of Bitdefender has been shown to obtain good protection against common malware and offer 99% protection against zero-day attacks. Additionally , it had a very low post-installation background impression and a reasonably light system impact during full tests.

Trend Tiny

Ant-virus Performance Comparability